[netsa-tools-discuss] Extracting fields from Netflow V9 using SiLK
Sukrit Dasgupta
sukdasgu at cisco.com
Mon Nov 24 09:22:57 EST 2014
Mark thanks a lot for these pointers. I took some time to go through the code and figure out the moving parts before replying to you.
Will try to get this going.
Thanks,
-- Sukrit
On Nov 19, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Mark Thomas <mthomas at cert.org> wrote:
> Sukrit-
>
> If you want to do a "quick and dirty" hack to support MAC addresses,
> you could repurpose the NextHop IP field to hold the MAC addresses
> as long as you force all records to be stored as IPv6.
>
> To do that:
>
> The IPFIX/NetFlow v9 to SiLK translation occurs in the file
> src/libflowsource/skipfix.c. Modify the ski_rwrec_spec[] array in
> that file so that the MAC addresses (plus some padding) appears in
> the 16 bytes normally used for the "ipNextHopIPv6Address".
>
> Ensure src/libflowsource/skipfix.c always writes its records as IPv6
> so the the MAC addresses are visible when viewing a record. This
> maps the IPv4 source and destination addresses into the
> ::ffff:0:0/96 net-block.
>
> Be certain to configure and compile SiLK with IPv6 support.
>
> In the rwflowpack configuration, be sure to include the
> --pack-interfaces switch so the NextHop IP addresses are stored (by
> default, they and the SNMP interfaces are dropped).
>
>
> To do things the "correct" way would take much more work. SiLK Flow
> records are defined by a C struct, and changes to this structure can
> have affects throughout the tool suite. In addition, knowledge of
> the fields available in the structure is shared throughout the tool
> suite. Adding new fields requires changes in many parts of the
> code. That said, the task is not impossible and it tends to be more
> tedious than difficult.
>
> The in-core SiLK format is defined in src/libsilk/rwrec.h. Storage
> of the SiLK format is defined in several files in the src/libsilk
> directory; for an IPv6 compile of SiLK, the on-disk format is given
> in the rwipv6io.c and rwipv6routingio.c files. Uses of the SiLK
> fields in the source code can be found the the Perl regexp
> 'rwRec(Mem|)(Get|Set)'. Where that regexp occurs, you probably want
> to add similar code to handle the MAC addresses.
>
>
> SiLK is released by CERT/CC, which is part of the Software
> Engineering Institute, a Federally Funded Research and Development
> Center (FFRDC). As an FFRDC, code we write must pass through
> release approval before it is made public. While we would like to
> get more feedback earlier, it is difficult given the release
> approval requirement.
>
> -Mark
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:17:21 -0500, Sukrit Dasgupta wrote:
>
>> (including the netsa mailing list to keep record if others have
>> the same query).
>>
>> Thanks for your response Mark.
>>
>> This is sad (However I still have long term plans to continue to use it because it is very useful). Few questions:
>>
>> 1. Any chance I could get some pointers on where the code is if we
>> needed to implement these changes ourselves (for the time being)?
>>
>> 2. Any way I could get a chance to work on an early alpha/pre-alpha release?
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -- Sukrit
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Mark Thomas <mthomas at cert.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Sukrit-
>>>
>>> Thank you for your email. It is very nice to read that you find the
>>> NetSA tools so useful.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the answer to your question is that the current
>>> version of SiLK supports a fixed set of fields, and adding new
>>> fields to the core of SiLK is fairly involved.
>>>
>>> The next major release of SiLK will support flexible file formats,
>>> and adding additional fields to at that point should be
>>> straightforward. Currently there is no estimate as to when the next
>>> release of SiLK will be available.
>>>
>>> Thanks again for your question.
>>>
>>> -Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:23:45 -0500, Sukrit Dasgupta wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi SiLK team,
>>>>
>>>> I started using SiLK about 3 weeks ago for large scale NFv9 record
>>>> analysis and it has proven to be invaluable!
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to extract other non 5-tuple fields that have been
>>>> configured to be exported using NFv9 on a Cisco router?
>>>>
>>>> For example, in a record configuration like this (Cisco IOS):
>>>>
>>>> match ipv4 protocol
>>>> match ipv4 source address
>>>> match ipv4 destination address
>>>> match transport source-port
>>>> match transport destination-port
>>>> collect datalink mac source address input
>>>> collect datalink mac destination address output
>>>>
>>>> How could we extract the fields that have been specified as "collect":
>>>> the MAC addresses in this case. As NFv9 sends out templates, I was
>>>> hoping this was doable.
>>>>
>>>> Any help will be great!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>> -- Sukrit
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.sei.cmu.edu/pipermail/netsa-tools-discuss/attachments/20141124/b3b71786/attachment.sig>
More information about the netsa-tools-discuss
mailing list