[netsa-tools-discuss] Fwd: silk

Daniel Hermans daniel.hermans at gmail.com
Wed Dec 13 16:14:23 EST 2017


Hi,
Thanks for prompt reply.
Apologies for not including my config files but yes I am using the
zero-packets quirk:

probe ME1A netflow-v9
  listen-on-port 2055
  listen-as-host 10.39.32.50
  protocol udp
  quirks zero-packets
end probe

group local-networks
  ipblocks 10.0.0.0/8
end group

sensor ME1A
  netflow-v9-probes ME1A
  internal-ipblocks @local-networks
  external-ipblocks remainder
end sensor

i recompiled with TRACE active - i just get a new message:
Found zero bytes or packets; byte=344, pkt=0, rev_byte=0, rev_pkt=0

inexpertly reading the code - i see the quirk is processed in this if block:
} else if (!(record->bmap & NF9REC_INITIATOR)) }

which it never enters for my data


So as you suggest i'm doing something wrong in my config for it not to
process the quirk
Any ideas appreciated!

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Mark Thomas <mthomas at cert.org> wrote:

> Daniel-
>
> Thank you for using the NetSA tools.
>
> SiLK is ignoring your data because the template used by your router
> does not include the number of packets in the flow.  The template
> include the octetDeltaCount but not a corresponding
> packetDeltaCount.
>
> There is a work-around for this issue in SiLK, which requires that
> you edit the sensor.conf file that rwflowpack is using.  In the
> probe block for your router, add the following:
>
>   quirks zero-packets
>
> This causes rwflowpack to use a packet count of 1 for all incoming
> flow records that do not have their own packet count, and that
> should allow rwflowpack to store the records.
>
> I hope that solves your issue.
>
> -Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Hermans <daniel.hermans at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:51:05 +1100
> To: <netsa-tools-discuss at cert.org>
> Subject: [netsa-tools-discuss] Fwd: silk
>
> Hi SiLK team,
>
> I'm trying to get SILK to ingest netflow v9 flows and having some issues as
> can be seen by the logs below (with the template shown):
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Will process template
> 0x0101 with the YAF template
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Contains 8 Elements, Enabled by
> SILK_IPFIX_PRINT_TEMPLATES
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Position   0, Length     4, IE           8, Name
> sourceIPv4Address
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Position   1, Length     4, IE          12, Name
> destinationIPv4Address
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Position   2, Length     4, IE          10, Name
> ingressInterface
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Position   3, Length     4, IE          14, Name
> egressInterface
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Position   4, Length     2, IE           7, Name
> sourceTransportPort
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Position   5, Length     2, IE          11, Name
> destinationTransportPort
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Position   6, Length     1, IE           4, Name
> protocolIdentifier
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]: Domain 0X0001,
> TemplateID 0X0101, Position   7, Length     4, IE           1, Name
> octetDeltaCount
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.252.91|10.39.132.10|51702|25|6|0|344|byte or packet count is
> zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.39.221|10.11.40.143|8089|26286|6|0|7173|byte or packet count
> is zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.133.138|10.39.248.145|25|16976|6|0|566|byte or packet count
> is zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.181.67|10.39.145.255|31055|443|6|0|2107|byte or packet count
> is zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.39.221|10.40.29.69|8089|62069|6|0|6970|byte or packet count
> is zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.38.4|10.11.40.233|8089|29179|6|0|6021|byte or packet count
> is
> zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.39.46|10.108.10.84|58492|80|6|0|551|byte or packet count is
> zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.39.120|10.40.28.248|9997|50238|6|0|12292|byte or packet
> count
> is zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.38.4|10.11.40.40|8089|33242|6|0|6125|byte or packet count is
> zero|
>
> Dec 12 14:47:27 ip-10-39-128-243 rwflowpack[4370]:
> IGNORED|10.39.132.10|10.39.252.91|25|51702|6|0|566|byte or packet count is
> zero|
>
>
>
>
>
> So all messages are ignored. A typical flow record as seen in wireshark
> looks like:
>
> Flow 1
>
>     SrcAddr: 10.39.154.46
>
>     DstAddr: 10.108.162.144
>
>     InputInt: 133
>
>     OutputInt: 0
>
>     SrcPort: 443
>
>     DstPort: 51769
>
>     Protocol: TCP (6)
>
>     Octets: 83026
>
>
>
>
> Any thoughts as to what I'm doing wrong?
>
> I don't actually know the model number of Cisco device(s) sending the flow
> ( the flows are sent from a service provider )  but i believe it's a Nexus
> 9K
>
>
> My sensor and silk configs are small and simple - 1 sensor, 1 v9 flow etc..
>
>
> I'm rusty on C but tried to enable TRACE mode based on a post I saw on the
> archive list.
>
>
> Didn't get too far with that either, as when I compile libfixbuf-1.8.0 it
> installs the shared object /usr/local/lib/libfixbuf.so.3.2.0 rather than
> /usr/local/lib/libfixbuf.so.1.8.0
>
>
> The  silk-3.16.0 configure then does not find the shared object and doesn't
> enable netflow support ( fails the version check )
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed


More information about the netsa-tools-discuss mailing list